FUZZFACED
  • Home
  • Home
  • Stratocaster
  • Stratocaster
  • Telecaster
  • Telecaster
  • Les Paul
  • Les Paul
  • Marshall & Celestion
  • Marshall & Celestion
  • Pedals
  • Pedali
  • my gear
  • my gear
  • Stories
  • Aneddoti
  • Blog
  • Blog
  • Shop
<<< The PAF: PART #1
History of the Les Paul
Next >>>

Were the P.A.F. pickups all inconsistent?

Gibson PAF
Italiano
English
Foto

By Mario Milan

Journalist for Axe and author of: 
The Gibson "P.A.F." Humbucking pickup: from myth to reality
Pickups, windings and magnets: and the guitar became electric

Mario Milan's booksMario Milan's books
Let’s dispel some legends: the PAFs were all inconsistent.
False, the legend came about because resistance was believed to be the most important parameter and, noticing that it varied a lot, the belief arose that PAFs were all inconsistent.  However, the specs were clear: about 5000 turns of AWG 42 wire. So why are the resistance values so different?  The answer is simple: the AWG 42 wire must have a thickness between 0.061 mm and 0.068 mm, with a nominal value of about 0.064 mm, if it is thinner it becomes AWG 43, if it is thicker it becomes AWG 41.  If you wind two pickups with an AWG 42 wire with an effective diameter of 0.062 mm, you will have a higher resistance; if you use a 0.067 mm wire, the resistance will be lower; but if the number of turns is the same, the output level will be identical and the timbre almost equal.  Consequently, if a pickup had about 5000 turns per coil and the wire was AWG 42, Gibson didn't care about the resulting resistance.
Even on magnets there is a misconception.  Firstly because what we now call AlNiCo 2, 4, 5 etc., do not exactly correspond to the grades of the time, which had less marked differences between them, secondly because they were all magnetized in the same way, which still reduced the differences.
It follows then, that if two pickups had a definable “Gibson sound”, with an adequate output level, that was fine.  Each finished guitar, before being sent to the warehouse, was examined by ​Rem Wall, who did not measure pickup resistances, he played it and if he did not find defects of any kind, he gave the ok, otherwise he reported the problem and sent it back to the laboratory.

Contatti e Mailing List
La pubblicità su Fuzzfaced
Privacy Policy 
Tab Store
Paypal

Copyzero
© COPYRIGHT 2014-2024 FUZZFACED.NET BY ANTONIO CALVOSA - TUTTI I DIRITTI RISERVATI
​La copia, la riproduzione, la pubblicazione e la redistribuzione dei contenuti, se non autorizzate espressamente dall'autore, sono vietate in qualsiasi modo o forma. 

DICHIARAZIONE
Le parole Fender®, Telecaster®, Stratocaster® e i design delle palette sono marchi registrati di Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.

Contacts and Mailing List
Advertising on Fuzzfaced
Privacy Policy
Tab Store
PayPal

Copyzero
© COPYRIGHT 2014-2024 FUZZFACED.NET BY ANTONIO CALVOSA - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
The copying, reproduction, publication and redistribution of the contents, unless expressly authorized by the author, are prohibited in any way or form.

DISCLOSURE
The words Fender®, Telecaster®, Stratocaster® and the associated headstock designs are registered trademarks of the Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.
  • Home
  • Home
  • Stratocaster
  • Stratocaster
  • Telecaster
  • Telecaster
  • Les Paul
  • Les Paul
  • Marshall & Celestion
  • Marshall & Celestion
  • Pedals
  • Pedali
  • my gear
  • my gear
  • Stories
  • Aneddoti
  • Blog
  • Blog
  • Shop